ThePhilosophyCenter: Empiricism #3

 Hello!

I forgot to write on Monday so this Wednesday will be the replacement. 

Today we will discuss David Hume, an influential Empiricist philosopher after Locke. He is a very important figure in philosophy, politics, and religion. Before seeing his empiricist theories, let's study his other views.

1. 

He was among the first to oppose the traditional religious belief and began secular philosophy and morality. He criticized the standards of the time. This is why we definitely be careful while discussing empiricism. He was against miracles.

2. 

He was also a historian and had political views, especially pro-monarchist, supporting the statement that monarchy was optimal. He was anti-mercantilist (mercantilism being the practice of trade through import taxes to generate money).

Hume's Empiricism

He was strongly against innate ideas, which was a key rationalist belief, and then divides the knowledge in our minds into two kinds of phenomena: that being impressions and ideas. Impressions are firsthand perceptions and sensations whereas ideas are more like faint copies and reflections of said impressions. This means we reflect from our perceptions.

Sometimes, our ideas cannot be supported by impressions. Hume also had two kinds of statements, namely demonstrative or probable. We confuse the two types regularly. A demonstrative statement is a statement which can be falsified or proved by itself, its falsity or correctness is self-evident. Meanwhile, a probable statement is not self evident but needs proving, specifically through empirical experiment or evidence. 

Now, Hume uses this to falsify the idea of inductive inference, inferring past knowledge to reason, For example, we expect the sun to rise every morning, but it is not completely justifiable. The statement of the sun rising every morning is neither a demonstrative or probable statement, so it  us meaningless, according to Hume, because we cannot prove whether it is true or false. 

The same goes with causality and effect. We cannot prove Event A causes Event B all the time. However, Hume doesn't completely oppose inductive inference since we can still expect something. However, Hume says custom is a good guide. Custom referring to habits.

However, Christianity does support the idea of innate ideas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ThePhilosophyCenter: Rationalism #2

ThePhilosophyCenter: Metaphysics, Epistemology: Platonism

ThePhilsophyCenter: Ethics: Epicureanism